This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Are Reed's Rules of Parliamentary Procedure in use anywhere in the U.S. except the Washington State Legislature? If they are (or even if not), do they deserve a mention? Jwrosenzweig07:36, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Reed was only 13 when Henry Clay died... I can't imagine he actually said that to him (rather be right than president"— Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.226.114.227 (talk • contribs)
The lead section now says "he served with greater influence than any Speaker who came before, and he forever increased its power and influence for those who succeeded him in the position." But Tuchman in her chapter on Reed refers to him "having the powers later lost forever in the revolt against Cannon" (quote is from memory and may not be exact) and our article on Speaker Cannon seems to say much the same thing. So perhaps "he forever increased its power and influence" is incorrect. Does anyone else have a view? DES(talk)17:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's accurate. Use this analogy: before Reed, Speaker-power = 50; Reed raises it to 60; Cannon raises it to 70 then Cannon is forced back to 60 where it remains. Rjensen (talk) 20:11, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]